PROBLEMS: Association Status 
 

The Campus Glen Homeowners' Association was incorporated on September 27, 1994 with the Office of the Secretary of State (UBI# 601575435) as a non-profit corporation as set forth in Section 1, Article X of the CCR, and Article I of the Bylaws under the provision of RCW 24-03 by a profit-corporation called Campus Glen Limited Partnership

The Campus Glen Homeowners' Association was DISSOLVED (ceased to legally exist) under the Washington State regulation on January 4, 1999 as its license was expired. In the lay terms, the Secretary of State signs a "death certificate" for the Campus Glen Homeowners' Association, by a 'natural cause'! The screen-shot on the left was accessed the database of the Secretary of State, Corporation Division on March 27, 2003.

Information can get from the Secretary of State, Corporation Division at (360) 735-7115 or through the Website:

    http://www.secstate.wa.gov/
    Click on "CORPORATION" of the left column
    Click on "CORPORATION SEARCH" of the left column
    Enter the association UBI number: 601575435
    Click "SEARCH"
Under the laws of Washington State, there is NO Campus Glen Homeowners' Association as a nonprofit corporation, which can legally do business transactions such as imposing/collecting dues, hiring staff, contracting services, just name a few.
 

This information was discovered on January 9, 2003 and I sent e-mail to some homeowners, including volunteer people self imposing as the association's directors. The then self-proclaimed president recognized that information through his e-mail:

 
On February 25, 2003, a staff of CDC Management Services, Inc., claimed as "Campus Glen Homeowners Community Association Manager" wrote in his letter [the letter was digitally scanned, please read Disclaimer] :

Then on the letter dated February 27, 2003, a lawyer, "representing the association" (as he claimed, if there were legally one) chimed in WITHOUT any kind of proofs, legal documents to support:

Is the status of the SAME 'Campus Glen Homeowners' Association' changed from "non-profit corporation" to "unincorporated association"? If so, this case would NOT be "SUCCESSOR" because it IS ONE entity.

Are there TWO separated entities/organizations: a new and distinct 'Campus Glen Homeowners' Association' unincorporated association AND the old dissolved 'Campus Glen Homeowners' Association' non-profit corporation, so the former one can be the SUCCESSOR of the latter? If so, then there are lots of unsolved questions!

 
Both are responding to my open-letter to the neighbourhood (including my letter to CDC). It's very interesting to note that I discovered the dissolution status of Campus Glen Homeowners' Association ON January 9, 2003. How does this happen: The Board of Directors became aware of this issue in December 2002 during the Holidays. On January 1, 2003, CDC Management Services took over management responsibilities working on behalf of the governing Board of Directors. We checed the status of incorporation and indeed confirmed that it had expired. [from the letter] is beyond my imagination!

Surely, the fact that the Campus Glen Homeowners' Association as a non-profit corporation is currently INACTIVE, it can be REACTIVATED in some manner and procedure. However its validity and construct enforceability are preserved.

Changing the association to "unincorporated association" starts a whole new ball game. By definition, the association is not a separated entity, but is rather a body of individuals acting together for the prosecution of a common enterprise. It cannot do anything by ITSEFT! It CANNOT do miracle: raised itself from "death" with a brand new head "unincorporated." Some kind of "mission impossible"?

Since when was this unincorporated association formed?

Who are the persons —homeowners or strangers— composing it?

Where is the voluntary contract signed by people in associating themselves together?

Who is the authority to declare this organization as the successor of the dissolved CGHOA?

and mandatory membership?

Soon new statements come up to cover the old ones without any proofs, from strangers. We, members of the community, the OWNERS of the association, have NO idea of what's going on, were not informed, consulted, involved in the decision making process, even just a few actively participating. When will they accept the reality and react properly, instead of putting their heads in the sand, and pretending that nothing really happens?

Do they understand what does it mean "unincorpated association"? Legal manuals define that an "unincorporated association" is a "voluntary organization", and "one may seek, or be accepted into, membership in the organization as a matter of choice." (6 Am Jur 2d, Associations and Clubs, §1). It bases on VOLUNTARY participation. Members can resign as they wish. Decisions are bound ONLY to whomever signing the agreement. To be MANDATORY, it has to get the court to declare that status as labor unions do!

I never doubt that an "unincorporated association" can be very functional, effective. It depends on its members. Responsibilities are NOT binding to the association but to individual members who sign such documents. Their signatures will hold them and them alone, individually responsible. That's the court's decision in Riss vs. Angel!

WHERE ARE SUPPORTING LEGAL DOCUMENTS ? WHO MADE THOSE CRITICAL DECISIONS ? WHEN ?

The news came as a shock to me!

The CCR proclaims : "The Association shall be a non-profit corporation under the laws of the state of Washington"
(Article X, Section 1)

The Bylaws states "The Association shall be a non-profit corporation formed under the provisions of RCW 24.03"
(Article I)

The Articles of Incorporation emphasizes : "In compliance with the requirements of the Washington Nonprofit Corporation Act (R.C.W. 24.03), the undersigned, ..... forming a Corporation not for profit . . . . . The name of the Corporation is CAMPUS GLEN HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION.
(Preamble and Article I)

CONSEQUENTLY : The association CANNOT be anything else, but a nonprofit corporation governed by the RCW 24.03.
Until the current "association" can legally be proved by true authorities, and its legitimate members are duly notified, there is NO Campus Glen Homeowners' Association as defined by its own governing documents and by the Washington State laws it refers to.

WHAT CAN BE DONE ?
A special meeting of the members must be called to discuss the issue and decide a solution: accept the current dissolution status of the association or pursuit of reinstallation of the association. The power to call for a special member meeting is stated in the Article III of the HOA Bylaws:

Since there is NO appointed president NOR elected directors for the past three years, this special meeting has to be called by at least 25 (twenty-five) homeowners of Campus Glen Community. No outside people —except a legal authority such as a judge, an arbitrator exercising a just cause— even a lawyer, can legally and bindly call the meeting.

Hopefully, together we will make a better association.