PROBLEMS: Contract with a management company |
---|
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES |
---|
MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 7, 2002 BOARD MEETING
Based on a presentation by Jim Comin, president of CDC Management Services, Inc., [volunteered vice-president] made a motion, [a volunteered director] seconded and it was passed unanimously to terminate Around the Clock, Inc., as the Campus Glen management company and replace them with CDC Management Services, Inc. as of January 1, 2003 |
MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 21, 2002 GENERAL MEETING
a. Change in Management Company -- [Volunteered president] explained that there was going to be a change in the Campus Glen management company beginning January 1, 2003. The new management company was CDC Management Services, Inc. [a homeowner] had several questions about whether the new company had been hired already and would the homeowners have any say in the decision. [Volunteered vice-president] responded that a decision like that had to be made by the board as you couldn't expect to have all 99 homeowners vote on the decision. . . . . CDC staff explained that his company does three things. They take care of finances, take care of the physical plant, i.e., drive through and inspections, and provide administrative support such as providing advise on how to conduct meetings, taking care of the insurance, and helping to interpret the by-laws and the CC&R's. |
At the annual meeting of membership on November 21, 2003, there was NO motion to ratify the contract with CDC. Until the contract with CDC Management Services Inc., is approved by the association, as required by the HOA Bylaws, CDC should not involve in, unless it provides free services to the association and clearly states that (not $800.00 a month).
I want to tell a story before we're going down to "business" |
Sometimes ago, the state of Washington passed the curfew laws for youngsters limiting their outings from midnight to 5:00 am. I went a little more strict; my family's curfew was from 10:00 pm to 6:30 am. I made very sure that my children understood and obeyed that rule as long as they were under my roof. There was NO conflict between MY laws and the state's laws regarding the curfew to MY children. Mine is more strict for MY children and NOTHING is wrong about that. I WILL NOT allow any managers, butlers, nannies, servants, hired persons, who collect money from me to care my children, came in and told my children that my CURFEW LAW was wrong, they should ignore it, followed the state's law, and took them out for a spin to midnight!!!
|
So, in "helping to interpret the by-laws and the CC&R's" what's the CDC assigned staff behaving?
Just coming on board, the CDC staff started destroying the dedicated, well intended status of the association. CDC's letter on February 25, 03 reclassifies the association as a "unincorporated association" under the Washington State Homeowners Act (RCW 64.38). His tactics was to elude the criminal problems with the state laws:
RCW 9.24.050 False report of corporation.
Every director, officer or agent of any corporation or joint stock association, and every person engaged in organizing or promoting any enterprise, who shall knowingly make or publish or concur in making or publishing any written prospectus, report, exhibit or statement of its affairs or pecuniary condition, containing any material statement that is false or exaggerated, shall be punished by imprisonment in a state correctional facility for not more than ten years, or by a fine of not more than five thousand dollars.
Changing the association to "unincorporated association" starts a whole new ball game. Please read the "PROBLEMS: Association status" for more info.
Destroying the association's "governing documents", items by items.
In the first letter (February 14, 2003) to "Campus Glen Homeowners Association Members", [CDC staff] AMS®, CMCA®, Community Association Manager attacked the "Declaration of Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions" in the name of the board of directors:
Then he continued to crash the Declaration and the Bylaws by changing the method of director's selection: VOLUNTEERS, completely against every aspects of democracy concepts, theory, and practices. :
At present there are three volunteer association members on the Board of Directors. Mr. [previous volunteered-president-director] has resigned as Board President to devote time to his family. The current Directors and their officer positions are:
[name withheld] President
[name withheld] Vice Pres./Treasurer
[name withheld] Secretary
There are two vacancies on the Board. The remaining Directors can appoint new directors to complete the terms of the vacant positions per Article IV, section 3 of the bylaws.
What resolution(s) support that?
Who "left" the board beside the [previous volunteered-president-director] ?
What are the terms of this director and of the [previous volunteered-president-director]?
The main reason of the American Independence War is "Taxation without Representation". It means that the Americans will not pay any more taxes [dues] to the British government unless they have their elected representatives in the British government.
Running an association by volunteers is the same scenario. WE, the due-paid members DO NOT have our elected representatives in the decision-making process. We are robbed our basic right of selecting our leaders/representatives. Volunteers are NOT ELECTED officials of the association. They DO NOT have the collective delegated powers to make decisions for the members, on beheld of the association. They can only represent THEMSELVES.
Volunteers can magnificently contribute their works and energies for the welfare of the association but CANNOT represent the association for any LEGAL businesses, unless they falsify their positions and abuse their members' trusts. Their signatures will hold them and them alone, individually responsible in front of the court of laws.
Interpreting the Campus Glen's Declaration (CCR) in his OWN, destructive way.
In the first letter (February 14, 2003) to "Campus Glen Homeowners Association Members", [CDC staff] AMS®, CMCA®, Community Association Manager, after attacking a section of the "Declaration of Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions" (Article 8, section 5) , strangely invoked the same section when it fits his intention :
Not stopping there, he went on and sent out another one of his own rules:
Section 3. Alteration of Common Areas and Common Maintenance Areas. Nothing shall be altered, or constructed in, or removed from any Common Maintenance Areas except upon prior written consent of the Committee. There shall be no construction of any kind within the Common Areas except that community improvements may be constructed if two-thirds (2/3) of the members of the Association authorize (1) the construction of such improvements and (2) assessments for such improvements. [Article VI, Declaration]
Withholding information related to the purpose of the special meeting of the members.
On the CDC headed letter dated February 14, 2003 :
The Board of Directors and I, as your manager have been working with the local Post Office station manager recently on the possible options and costs associated with this suggested improvement. At the meeting, each option will be presented to the community and invite your input. As a community you will have an opportunity to vote for one of the available options after hearing their elements. The details of the options are still being worked out and therefore I am unable to describe them to you in this newsletter. Your participation is welcome. This is an opportunity for the community membership to become involved in a positive way in steering the outcome of this issue.
Engaging in a fraud activity: locking mailboxes.
It is discussed in more detail in the section "PROBLEMS: Locking mailboxes"