PROBLEMS: Contract with a management company 
 
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES
CAMPUS GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
MINUTES FOR
NOVEMBER 7, 2002 BOARD MEETING

III. New Business:
Based on a presentation by Jim Comin, president of CDC Management Services, Inc., [volunteered vice-president] made a motion, [a volunteered director] seconded and it was passed unanimously to terminate Around the Clock, Inc., as the Campus Glen management company and replace them with CDC Management Services, Inc. as of January 1, 2003

CAMPUS GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
MINUTES FOR
NOVEMBER 21, 2002 GENERAL MEETING

III. Old Business:
a. Change in Management Company -- [Volunteered president] explained that there was going to be a change in the Campus Glen management company beginning January 1, 2003. The new management company was CDC Management Services, Inc. [a homeowner] had several questions about whether the new company had been hired already and would the homeowners have any say in the decision. [Volunteered vice-president] responded that a decision like that had to be made by the board as you couldn't expect to have all 99 homeowners vote on the decision. . . . .

CDC staff explained that his company does three things. They take care of finances, take care of the physical plant, i.e., drive through and inspections, and provide administrative support such as providing advise on how to conduct meetings, taking care of the insurance, and helping to interpret the by-laws and the CC&R's.

 

WHAT DOES THE HOA BYLAWS SAY . . . (Article VIII, Section 2, Item 'm')

[The Board of Directors shall] have the exclusive right to contract for goods, services, maintenance and capital improvement provided, however, that such right of contract shall be subject to Association approval.
 

At the annual meeting of membership on November 21, 2003, there was NO motion to ratify the contract with CDC. Until the contract with CDC Management Services Inc., is approved by the association, as required by the HOA Bylaws, CDC should not involve in, unless it provides free services to the association and clearly states that (not $800.00 a month).

 

I want to tell a story before we're going down to "business"
Sometimes ago, the state of Washington passed the curfew laws for youngsters limiting their outings from midnight to 5:00 am. I went a little more strict; my family's curfew was from 10:00 pm to 6:30 am. I made very sure that my children understood and obeyed that rule as long as they were under my roof. There was NO conflict between MY laws and the state's laws regarding the curfew to MY children. Mine is more strict for MY children and NOTHING is wrong about that.

I WILL NOT allow any managers, butlers, nannies, servants, hired persons, who collect money from me to care my children, came in and told my children that my CURFEW LAW was wrong, they should ignore it, followed the state's law, and took them out for a spin to midnight!!!

 

So, in "helping to interpret the by-laws and the CC&R's" what's the CDC assigned staff behaving?

Just coming on board, the CDC staff started destroying the dedicated, well intended status of the association. CDC's letter on February 25, 03 reclassifies the association as a "unincorporated association" under the Washington State Homeowners Act (RCW 64.38). His tactics was to elude the criminal problems with the state laws:

Surely, the fact that the Campus Glen Homeowners' Association as a non-profit corporation is currently INACTIVE, it can be REACTIVATED in some manner and procedure. However its validity and construct enforcibility are preserved.

Changing the association to "unincorporated association" starts a whole new ball game. Please read the "PROBLEMS: Association status" for more info.

Destroying the association's "governing documents", items by items.
In the first letter (February 14, 2003) to "Campus Glen Homeowners Association Members", [CDC staff] AMS®, CMCA®, Community Association Manager attacked the "Declaration of Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions" in the name of the board of directors:

Where is the loyalty and swearing of protecting and defending our "governing documents"? Through the letter, CDC staff played the role of a prosecutor, a judge, and an executioner at the same time! Life composes of controversies at one time another. The method of solving it IS NOT "taking the laws into your own hands." Our CCR wisely addresses such controversies and methods of solving them in Article XVI, Section 5.

Then he continued to crash the Declaration and the Bylaws by changing the method of director's selection: VOLUNTEERS, completely against every aspects of democracy concepts, theory, and practices. :

So the number of directors now is FIVE (?)

What resolution(s) support that?

Who "left" the board beside the [previous volunteered-president-director] ?

What are the terms of this director and of the [previous volunteered-president-director]?

The main reason of the American Independence War is "Taxation without Representation". It means that the Americans will not pay any more taxes [dues] to the British government unless they have their elected representatives in the British government.

Running an association by volunteers is the same scenario. WE, the due-paid members DO NOT have our elected representatives in the decision-making process. We are robbed our basic right of selecting our leaders/representatives. Volunteers are NOT ELECTED officials of the association. They DO NOT have the collective delegated powers to make decisions for the members, on beheld of the association. They can only represent THEMSELVES.

Volunteers can magnificently contribute their works and energies for the welfare of the association but CANNOT represent the association for any LEGAL businesses, unless they falsify their positions and abuse their members' trusts. Their signatures will hold them and them alone, individually responsible in front of the court of laws.

 
Interpreting the Campus Glen's Declaration (CCR) in his OWN, destructive way.
In the first letter (February 14, 2003) to "Campus Glen Homeowners Association Members", [CDC staff] AMS®, CMCA®, Community Association Manager, after attacking a section of the "Declaration of Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions" (Article 8, section 5) , strangely invoked the same section when it fits his intention :

WHAT DOES SECTION 5 OF ARTICLE VIII OF THE DECLARATION SAY . . .

The CDC staff had bypassed the "same notice requirement" by implanting the second notification right into the letter! Save time; save stamps; save money ... But is it legal and businesslike?

Not stopping there, he went on and sent out another one of his own rules:

WHAT DOES THE DECLARATION SAY . . .

Where is the mention of "simple majority" rule ?

Withholding information related to the purpose of the special meeting of the members.

On the CDC headed letter dated February 14, 2003 :

On the CDC headed letter dated February 25, 2003 :

Nothing is included with those letters. If the information is not available then the meeting is not properly prepared. It's similar to the "car-sale" tactic. You will get the information if you attend the meeting. You have to make decision AT the meeting! That's is NOT a regular business practice. Attending the meeting or not is irrelevant to the requirement of providing appropriate information so the members can have time to study the issues, investigating alternatives, before making any commitment to a project. It takes times.

Engaging in a fraud activity: locking mailboxes.

It is discussed in more detail in the section "PROBLEMS: Locking mailboxes"